研究目的
The primary goal of this paper is to identify the root causes for the degradation differences (one set meeting specifications, the other not), based upon the critical module materials properties/processing and climatic exposures.
研究成果
The study concluded that the significant differences in degradation between the two module sets were primarily due to the encapsulant material and its processing. SET A modules, with fast-cured EVA and higher gel content, showed minimal degradation, while SET B modules, with slow-cured EVA, exhibited significant discoloration, delamination, and corrosion, leading to higher power degradation rates. The findings highlight the importance of encapsulant material properties and processing in ensuring the long-term reliability of PV modules.
研究不足
The study was limited to modules from two manufacturers operating under tropical climate conditions. The findings may not be universally applicable to all PV modules or climates. Additionally, the study focused on the degradation of encapsulant materials and did not extensively explore other potential degradation mechanisms.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study involved comparing modules from two different manufacturers deployed under similar circumstances for about 15 years. The methodology included visual inspections, electrical characterization, thermographic imaging, and chemical analysis of the module materials.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Modules were selected from approximately 1000 stand-alone PV systems operated by the Energetic Company of Minas Gerais (CEMIG), installed in the northeastern region of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Equipment included a AAA-commercial flash simulator for I-V characteristics, a commercial infrared camera (NEC/Sane) for thermographic imaging, and various chemical analysis tools like SEM, EDS, ATR-FTIR, TG, DTG, and DSC.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The study started with visual inspections, followed by electrical and thermal characterization, and concluded with chemical and compositional diagnostic characterization.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
The analysis included calculating degradation rates from electrical parameters, comparing thermal maps, and analyzing chemical changes in the encapsulant materials.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容