研究目的
Investigating the therapeutic effects of a specific herbal medicine on a particular disease.
研究成果
Double-bubble jetting (DBJ) proves superior to single-bubble jetting (SBJ) in achieving the same penetration lengths at safer stand-off distances and minimized surface damages. DBJ's potential for needle-free applications is demonstrated, though further studies are needed to optimize injection efficiency and understand underlying processes fully.
研究不足
The study is limited by the experimental setup's ability to fully understand vapor entrainment into formed cavities and the effects of relative bubble ratios, solution surface tension, and viscosity on penetration lengths.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study utilized two Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers to generate cavitation bubbles in deionized water, focusing on the interaction dynamics of two bubbles to form microjets. High-speed shadowgraphy was employed to study the jetting dynamics.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Soft paraffin and agar gel were used as target materials to characterize and compare the damages from single-bubble and double-bubble jetting.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Equipment included two Q-switched Nd:YAG lasers, a high-speed Phantom camera, an Infinity microscope, and a pulse delay generator. Materials included deionized water, soft paraffin, and agar gel.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The study involved generating bubbles in DI water, directing jets towards soft materials, and analyzing the damage sites using optical microscopy and high-speed imaging.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Jet speeds and damage characteristics were analyzed using ImageJ, with statistical techniques applied to compare single- and double-bubble jetting effects.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容