研究目的
To characterize and compare the effect of the two primary types of regularization ((cid:2)1 versus (cid:2)2) on the solution of general convex optimization problems involving real-valued linear measurements.
研究成果
The paper concludes that (cid:2)1 regularization is more favorable for injecting prior knowledge into the solution of linear inverse problems, as it results in a functional form that is independent of the system matrix, unlike (cid:2)2 regularization. The (cid:2)1 solutions are intrinsically sparse, formed by adaptively selecting a subset of atoms in a dictionary specified by the regularization operator.
研究不足
The analysis is theoretical and does not include empirical validation. The infinite-dimensional analysis becomes more technical, requiring the invocation of the weak? topology to specify the full solution set of the generic (cid:2)1-norm minimization problem.