研究目的
To analyze the result of the observation of sperm-head vacuoles using Papanicolaou staining under a light microscope and whether the male partner’s age affects these vacuoles.
研究成果
A majority of the sperm-head vacuoles showed a statistically significant difference among normal morphology groups. Therefore, we should consider the probability of the percentage of sperm-head vacuoles not increasing with age but with abnormal sperm morphology. A further study is required to clarify the effect of the sperm-head vacuoles on ART outcomes.
研究不足
The study did not clarify the exact cause of the increase in the proportion of sperm-head vacuoles in the normal sperm. Further investigations are necessary to compare observations and the sperm nucleus maturity evaluated with the aniline blue-eosin staining method, and to further define the relationship between the sperm-head vacuoles and the ART outcomes.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
Sperm morphology with vacuoles was evaluated using Papanicolaou staining and observed under a light microscope (400×) in 980 men. The normal morphology was divided into three categories (group A, <4% of normal morphology; group B, 4%–14% of normal morphology; and group C, >14% of normal morphology). The criteria for the sperm-head vacuoles were those given in the World Health Organization manual. For the analysis of the age factor, the participants were divided into the following groups: 26–30 years, 31–35 years, 36–40 years, 41–45 years, and 46–50 years.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Semen was collected by masturbation into a sterile plastic cup after a period of 3–5 days of sexual abstinence.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Light microscope (400×), modified Papanicolaou staining method.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The semen specimen was left for at least 30 minutes at room temperature for liquefaction. The sperm characteristics (volume, count, motility, viability, and morphology) and the criteria for the sperm-head vacuoles were assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, ver. 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Each parameter was compared among the groups by using one-way analysis of variance. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容