研究目的
To compare the effect of two preprocessing methods on retinal vessel segmentation methods, Laplacian-of-Gaussian edge detector, Canny edge detector, and Matched filter edge detector in normal fundus images or in the presence of retinal lesions like diabetic retinopathy.
研究成果
The study demonstrates that using the first preprocessing method (Illumination equalization and contrast enhancement) with the Matched filter edge detector achieves the highest accuracy for retinal vessel segmentation across all tested databases. The method is robust and can assist in the automated detection of diabetic retinopathy signs.
研究不足
The study is limited by the need for manual segmentation by ophthalmologists for comparison, and the performance of the segmentation methods varies with the preprocessing method used.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study compares two preprocessing methods (Illumination equalization and contrast enhancement, and top-hat transform) on three retinal vessel segmentation methods (Laplacian-of-Gaussian, Canny, and Matched filter).
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Three datasets were used: MUMS-DB (120 images), DRIVE (40 images), and MESSIDOR (120 images).
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
TOPCON (TRC-50EX) 50 Mydriatic retinal camera for MUMS-DB, and a color video 3CCD camera on a Topcon TRC NW6 non-mydriatic retinograph for MESSIDOR.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
The process includes smoothing, enhancement, detection, and localization steps for edge detection.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
The performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy metrics.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容