研究目的
Investigating the relationship between the morphology and activity for H2 and CO2 production, density of surface hydroxyl groups, ROS (?OH and ?O2-) production and photocatalytic activity, and charge separation at the interface of semiconducting domains and enhancement of activity on TiO2 anatase and sodium titanates with tubular morphology.
研究成果
The study concludes that the tubular morphology of sodium titanate offers a significantly higher surface area compared to parental anatase, which is advantageous for photocatalytic applications. The density of surface hydroxyl groups decreases with the development of tubular morphology, affecting the generation of ROS and photocatalytic activity. Charge separation at the interfaces of anatase and sodium titanate phases significantly enhances photocatalytic efficiency. The findings suggest that optimizing the interface between different crystalline phases and increasing the surface area are key strategies for improving photocatalytic performance.
研究不足
The research highlights the technical constraints related to the synthesis and characterization of sodium titanate nanotubes, including the need for precise control over hydrothermal conditions to achieve desired morphologies and surface properties. The study also points out the potential for optimization in the charge separation process at the interfaces of semiconducting domains to further enhance photocatalytic activity.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection
The methodology involves microwave-assisted alkaline hydrothermal treatment of crystalline TiO2, anatase, to synthesize sodium titanate samples. The photocatalytic activities for methanol reforming over sodium titanate samples and reference TiO2-anatase were measured under simulated solar light AM 1.5.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources
Samples were prepared by dispersing TiO2 in NaOH solution, followed by microwave treatment at 135°C for varying times. The samples were characterized by SEM, TEM, XRD, XPS, FTIR, and UV-Vis spectroscopy.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials
Microwave reactor (Anton Paar, Monowave 300), FE-SEM (Jeol 7600F), TEM (Jeol 2100), Rigaku Ultima IV diffractometer, Micromeritics ASAP 2020 automated gas sorption system, VG ESCA 3 MK II XPS installation, Nicolet 6700 FT-IR spectrophotometer, Perkin Elmer Lambda 35 spectrophotometer, Peccell-L01 simulated solar light source, Buck Scientific 910 gas chromatograph, Jasco FP-6500 spectrofluorometer.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow
The reaction mixture was treated in a microwave reactor at 135°C for varying times, washed, and dried. Photocatalytic tests were conducted by dispersing photocatalysts in water/methanol mixture under simulated solar light, with reaction products monitored by gas chromatography.
5:Data Analysis Methods
XRD data were analyzed using Rigaku’s PDXL Hybrid/Search algorithm. XPS spectra were processed using Spectral Data Processor v2.3. Optical bandgap was calculated using Tauc method. Photocatalytic activity was evaluated by monitoring H2 and CO2 production.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容