研究目的
Investigating the optimal location and sizing of solar photovoltaic distribution generation units (PVDGUs) in radial distribution systems to minimize total power losses, capacity of all PVDGUs, voltage profile index, and harmonic distortions while satisfying branch current limits, voltage limits, and harmonic distortion limits.
研究成果
The proposed ICOA method demonstrates superior performance in finding optimal locations and sizes for PVDGUs in radial distribution systems, outperforming COA and other metaheuristic algorithms in terms of solution quality, search stability, and convergence speed. The improvements to COA significantly enhance its effectiveness for the considered optimization problem.
研究不足
The study's limitations include the dependency on control parameters (NCo, Ng, ITMax) for the ICOA method, which requires careful tuning for each specific network. Additionally, the method's effectiveness is demonstrated on radial distribution systems, and its performance on other network types is not explored.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study employs an improved coyote optimization algorithm (ICOA) for optimizing the placement and sizing of PVDGUs. The methodology includes modifications to the conventional coyote optimization algorithm (COA) to enhance solution quality and search stability.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Two IEEE distribution power systems (33-bus and 69-bus networks) are used as test cases. These systems are modified to include nonlinear loads by injecting harmonic currents.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
The study utilizes MATLAB for simulation, with a personal computer (2.0 GHz processor, 2.0 GB RAM) as the hardware.
4:0 GHz processor, 0 GB RAM) as the hardware.
Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
4. Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow: The ICOA is applied to each test system to find optimal PVDGU locations and sizes. The process includes initializing parameters, generating solutions, evaluating fitness functions, and iterating to improve solutions.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
The performance of ICOA is compared against COA and other metaheuristic algorithms (BBO, GA, PSO, SFO, SSA) based on the best, average, and worst fitness values from 50 trial runs.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容