研究目的
The goal of this work is to compare the performance of six approaches to map the center line of railway tracks.
研究成果
The combination of conditional selection of GNSS data and the Kalman filter framework gave the best result for the track on which the measurement vehicle had moved, mapping almost 100% of the track. The combination of methods (ii) and (iii) and the combination of all three methods gave the best result for the other parallel tracks, mapping between 25% and 80%. The mean perpendicular distance of the mapped center lines from the reference data was 1.49 meters.
研究不足
The study does not account for the multi-path effect in GNSS observations, which could lead to errors in the computed position. Additionally, the algorithm for connecting points by lines needs improvement, especially at switches.