研究目的
To investigate the effect of amphiphilic polymers on the tissue distribution of chlorin e6 (Ce6) in tumor-bearing mice and compare it with clinically used photosensitizer Photoditazine.
研究成果
The use of polymeric formulation is reasonable for fluorescence diagnosis and PDT of cancer, as it showed comparable tumor tissue concentration to Photoditazine with less skin uptake and similar tumor-to-skin ratios to free Ce6.
研究不足
The study did not explore the mechanisms behind the pharmacokinetic behavior of Ce6–PVP and PDZ in bloodstream. The biodistribution analysis was limited to a 4-hour time-point post-injection.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study used polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), and pluronic F108 for dissolution of Ce
2:Dynamics of accumulation and clearance were investigated in vivo using fluorescence imaging. Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Female CBA mice with subcutaneous mouse cervical carcinoma were used.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
IVIS-Spectrum system for fluorescence imaging, spectrofluorometry for plasma concentration analysis, and Tissue Ruptor for tissue homogenization.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Mice were injected with Ce6, its complexes with polymers, or Photoditazine. Fluorescence imaging was performed at various time points. Plasma and tissue samples were analyzed for Ce6 content.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Statistical analysis was conducted using STATISTICA 10 software package with one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容