研究目的
To address the problems arising from the use of data acquired with two different remote sensing techniques (HRSI and TLS) for the extraction of DEMs used in geomorphological analysis and recognition of landslides, considering uncertainties associated with DEM production, and to enable comparative analysis for reliable landslide feature recognition.
研究成果
Both TLS and HRSI data are suitable for building DEMs and derived maps for geomorphological interpretation of landslides. Kriging provides reliable interpolation with uncertainty estimates. Expert-based validation confirms the qualitative reliability, and the method improves landslide parameter detection. Future work could involve algebraic combination of DEMs based on reliability thresholds.
研究不足
The study is limited to a specific landslide case in Southern Italy; TLS has frontal acquisition geometry limiting range, and HRSI may have issues in shadowed or vegetated areas. Differences in data acquisition times (six months apart) and processing complexities for satellite data are constraints.