1：Experimental Design and Method Selection:

The study involved electrospinning of PVDF with organically modified nanoclay (Cloisite 30B) at varying concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15, 20 wt.%) to create nanofibers. The electrospinning parameters were optimized (

2：5 kV potential, 5 ml/h flow rate, 10 wt.% solution concentration, 15 cm spinneret-drum distance, and

8 DMF:acetone solvent ratio).

3：Sample Selection and Data Sources:

Samples included pure PVDF nanofibers (P) and nanohybrids with nanoclay (C5, C10, C15, C20). Data were obtained from characterization techniques such as POM, SEM, XRD, FTIR, TGA, DSC, AFM, tensile testing, and electromechanical response measurements.

4：0). Data were obtained from characterization techniques such as POM, SEM, XRD, FTIR, TGA, DSC, AFM, tensile testing, and electromechanical response measurements. List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:

3. List of Experimental Equipment and Materials: Materials used were PVDF (SOLEF 6008), nanoclay (Cloisite 30B), DMF, and acetone. Equipment included electrospinning setup, POM (Leitz Biomed), SEM (SUPRA 40, Zeiss), XRD (Rigaku Miniflex 600), FTIR (Nicolet iS5), TGA (Mettler Toledo), DSC (Mettler 832), AFM (NTEGRA Prima, NT-MDT), tensile testing machine (Instron), and oscilloscope (Tektronix TBS 1072B).

5：Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:

Solutions were prepared by dissolving PVDF and dispersing nanoclay in DMF, mixing, stirring, and sonicating. Electrospinning was performed with specified parameters. Fibers were characterized for morphology, structure, thermal properties, and mechanical strength. Devices (unimorphs) were fabricated by encapsulating fibers in PDMS with electrodes, and piezoelectric responses were measured under various mechanical stresses.

6：Data Analysis Methods:

Data were analyzed using software tools for deconvolution of XRD peaks, calculation of phase fractions, power density (P = V^2 / (RL * A)), and statistical analysis of mechanical properties.