研究目的
To study the implications of two popular commercial millimeter wave UE designs (a face and an edge design) on spherical coverage, including the effects of hand blockage, and to evaluate tradeoffs in performance, beam management overhead, implementation complexity, and cost.
研究成果
The edge design provides a better tradeoff in terms of robust performance with hand blockage, lower beam management overhead, reduced implementation complexity, and cost compared to the face design. Both designs can achieve good spherical coverage with analog beam codebooks, but the edge design is more practical for commercial deployments due to its advantages in real-estate usage, exposure concerns, and mounting ease.
研究不足
The study does not account for display-related losses for the face design or frame-related losses for the edge design, which could affect practical performance. The blockage models may not fully capture all real-world variations, and the codebook designs are specific to the considered UE architectures.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
The study involves simulating and comparing two UE designs (face and edge) using antenna response functions obtained via Ansys HFSS software. Beamforming schemes include MRC, EGC, RF/analog beam codebook, and antenna selection. Blockage models from 3GPP and experimental prototypes are used to assess hand blockage effects.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Antenna response functions are computed for individual elements in both polarizations over the sphere with 1° precision in azimuth and elevation using HFSS simulations.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Ansys HFSS software for antenna simulations; UE designs with specific antenna modules (e.g., dual-polarized patch subarrays, dipole subarrays).
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
Simulate antenna responses, compute array gains for different beamforming schemes, apply blockage models (Portrait and Landscape modes), and analyze spherical coverage CDFs.
5:Data Analysis Methods:
Use cumulative distribution functions (CDFs) to evaluate spherical coverage performance, compare gains across schemes and designs, and conduct system-level simulations for spectral efficiency.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容