研究目的
To provide a comprehensive and comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of two manufacturing process plans for an aircraft engine turbine blade, comparing conventional manufacturing (Investment Casting and Precision Machining) with Additive Manufacturing (Selective Laser Melting) to evaluate environmental impacts.
研究成果
The study demonstrates that Additive Manufacturing (Selective Laser Melting) can reduce the carbon footprint and environmental impact by approximately 4% compared to Conventional Manufacturing (Investment Casting and Precision Machining). The results support the adoption of Additive Manufacturing for aerospace components to improve sustainability and reduce energy consumption.
研究不足
The study is limited to a gate-to-gate analysis, focusing on the manufacturing phase without considering maintenance, human capital, transport, and production of secondary materials. The sensitivity analysis suggests that changes in surface roughness and machining time could affect the environmental performance.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection
The study compares two manufacturing processes for turbine blades: Conventional Manufacturing (Investment Casting and Precision Machining) and Additive Manufacturing (Selective Laser Melting). The methodology includes data collection on energy consumption, material usage, and emissions for each process.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources
The case study focuses on the manufacturing of an aircraft engine turbine blade. Data for Investment Casting was complemented with literature, while data for Precision Machining and Selective Laser Melting was collected from manufacturing facilities.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials
Equipment includes Investment Casting machinery, Precision Machining tools, and Selective Laser Melting machines (SLM Solutions Group AG). Materials include Nickel alloy 100 (Inconel 100) for Investment Casting and Nickel alloy 718 (Inconel 718) for Selective Laser Melting.
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow
The study outlines the steps for each manufacturing process, including material preparation, part fabrication, and finishing operations. Energy consumption and emissions are measured at each stage.
5:Data Analysis Methods
The environmental impact is assessed using CML 2001 and USEtox methodologies, focusing on indicators like Global Warming Potential (GWP), Acidification Potential (AP), and Human Toxicity Potential (HTP).
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容