研究目的
To compare the visual, refractive and aberrometric results of intrastromal corneal ring segments implantation with manual dissection and femtosecond laser–assisted surgery in specific phenotypes of keratoconus.
研究成果
Both surgical techniques provide comparable visual, refractive and aberrometric outcomes, but the femtosecond laser is a safer surgical procedure with no complications reported.
研究不足
The study only included patients with specific morphologic characteristics of keratoconus and did not compare long-term outcomes beyond 6 months.
1:Experimental Design and Method Selection:
A multicentre prospective study comparing manual dissection and femtosecond laser–assisted surgery for ICRS implantation in keratoconus patients.
2:Sample Selection and Data Sources:
Consecutive patients with paracentral keratoconus, contact lens intolerance, transparent cornea, corneal thickness of ≥400 μm at the implantation zone, maximum keratometry reading ≤53 diopters (D) and minimum K reading ≥40 D.
3:List of Experimental Equipment and Materials:
Pentacam? (Oculus GmbH, Germany) for corneal topography and aberrometry, Visante? optical coherence tomography system (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc.; Jena, Germany) for pachymetry map, Keraring? SI6 ICRS (Mediphacos Inc., Belo Horizonte, Brazil).
4:Experimental Procedures and Operational Workflow:
ICRS implantation centered on the topographic flat axis, incision at the steepest topographic axis, and ring implanted at the
5:00-mm optical zone. Postoperative treatment included antibiotic and steroid eye drops. Data Analysis Methods:
Statistical analysis using SPSS, including descriptive statistics, Student’s t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, unpaired t test, and Mann–Whitney test.
独家科研数据包,助您复现前沿成果,加速创新突破
获取完整内容