摘要： Choroidal neovascularizations (CNV) occur not only in age-related macular degeneration (AMD), but also in numerous other macular and retinal disorders of varying etiology and, if left untreated, can cause irreversible visual loss. The diagnosis of CNV as well as the indication for treatment should be made in the same way as in neovascular AMD: On initial diagnosis: best-corrected visual acuity, fundus examination, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and fluorescein angiography. At follow-up: best-correct visual acuity, fundus examination, OCT, and, depending on findings, fluorescein angiography. Active CNV should be treated with intravitreal operative medication (IVOM) using vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors if patients have visual acuity of at least 0.05 or if there is sufficient reason to assume that visual acuity could increase to over 0.05 under treatment. Underlying disorders can include, e.g., high myopia, angioid streaks, central serous chorioretinopathy, active and inactive uveitis of varying etiology, including retinochoroiditis, chorioretinitis, and choroiditis, eye injuries, retinal dystrophies, e.g., best disease and pattern dystrophies, idiopathic CNV, subretinal masses (osteomas, hamartomas, nevi). If CNV is not present as a complication in the above-mentioned disorders, IVOM with VEGF inhibitors should not be performed. Ranibizumab and aflibercept are approved in Germany for the treatment of CNV secondary to pathologic myopia. Ranibizumab has been approved in Germany since 12/2016 for the treatment of CNV in disorders other than neovascular AMD and pathologic myopia irrespective of the underlying disease. The other VEGF inhibitors, aflibercept and bevacizumab, can be used off-label. Due to its overall significantly poorer treatment results, photodynamic therapy (PDT) should only be used in exceptional cases and extrafoveal localization. After one initial intravitreal administration of VEGF inhibitors, further CNV activity should be monitored monthly for the first 6 months (see point 2). In the case of persisting or recurrent activity, repeated IVOM should be performed. Depending on disease course, the follow-up interval might be extended 6 months after the last IVOM. In individual justified cases (e.g., patients requiring frequent re-injections), a different treatment regimen (e.g., treat and extend) can be considered in the further course. If visual acuity drops below 0.05 on anti-VEGF treatment, or no further positive treatment outcome is expected (e.g., in the presence of atrophy and/or fibrosis), treatment should be discontinued, unless there is a clear possibility that visual acuity could increase again to over 0.05 under treatment. If no improvement is seen under therapy with a certain VEGF inhibitor, or if deterioration occurs, one can consider switching to an alternative VEGF inhibitor.